AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Simple 100% width background css4/11/2024 ![]() Keywords syntax / background-size: cover background-size: contain / One-value syntax / / the width of the image. The contain keyword scales the background image to be as large as possible (but both its width and its height must fit inside the content area). The width here is critical: you want it to be the same width as your centered content area. The two other possible values for background-size are contain and cover. If the nav weren’t floated, it would collapse to a height of zero, rendering our background and border invisible Next, we’ve given the nav ul a fixed width and used the auto margin trick to center it. Another way is to use overflow: hidden for parent div and set width:100 for the child element. ![]() Adding margin: 0px to the body in css fixes the problem. The size of the image can be fully constrained or only partially in order to preserve its intrinsic ratio. Add background-position to set the positioning of the image for the smaller devices. Turns out Jmh2013 was right, there is a default margin applied to the body. Each point is represented by a pair of space-separated x and y values. The polygon () function accepts comma-separated coordinates or points as its values. The polygon () function requires at least 3 points, which creates a triangle, but there's no upper limit. This was originally an older post that didn’t take into consideration possible use of the border-box property. The background-size CSS property specifies the size of the background images. The order in which you define the points matters and can result in different shapes. So, if you have a parent container that’s 400px wide, a child element given a width of 100 will. This is just one of those things in CSS that seems easy to understand (and really, it should be), but it’s sometimes not - because of the way that percentages work in CSS. When you give an element a width of 100 in CSS, you’re basically saying Make this element’s content area exactly equal to the explicit width of its parent but only if its parent has an explicit width. ![]() I’m sure CSS developers of all skill levels have attempted something similar to what I’ve just described, with bizarre results ultimately leading to head scratching and shruggingly resorting to experimenting with absolute widths until we find just the right fit. I guess for that we will have to consult the video editors in which. This is probably the best way to achieve what you want, but keep in mind it will hide some parts of the video. This way if the video gets a bigger height it will be hidden by the parent div. If you want a block-level element to fill any remaining space inside of its parent, then it’s simple - just add width: 100% in your CSS declaration for that element, and your problem is solved. There are four different syntaxes you can use with this property: the keyword syntax ('auto', 'cover' and 'contain'), the one-value syntax (sets the width of the image (height becomes 'auto'), the two-value syntax (first value: width of the image, second value: height), and the multiple background syntax (separated with comma). So, you add a parent div with width: 100 and a max-height:600px with overflow:hidden. It seems like this should be one of the easiest things to understand in CSS.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |